Rule 8 F.R.Civ.P. applies in adversary proceedings. The allegation of jurisdiction required by Rule 8(a) shall also contain a reference to the name, number, and chapter of the case under the Code to which the adversary proceeding relates and to the district and division where the case under the Code is pending. In an adversary proceeding before a bankruptcy judge, the complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party complaint shall contain a statement that the proceeding is core or non-core and, if noncore, that the pleader does or does not consent to entry of final orders or judgment by the bankruptcy judge.
(As amended Mar. 30, 1987, eff. Aug. 1, 1987; Apr. 25, 2014, eff. Dec. 1, 2014.)
added in current removed in current
Compared to current version (2025).
Rule 8 F.Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 applies in an adversary proceedings. The allegation of jurisdiction required by Rule 8(a) shall also containthat rule must include a reference to the name, number, and Code chapter of the case under the Code to whichthat the adversary proceeding relates to and to the district and division where ithe case under the Code is pending. In an adversary proceeding before a bankruptcy judge, thecourt, a complaint, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party complaint shall contain a statement that the proceeding is core or non-core and, if noncore, thatmust state whether the pleader does or does not consent to the entry of final orders or judgment by the bankruptcy judgecourt.
(As amended Mar. 30, 1987, eff. Aug. 1, 1987; Apr. 25, 2014, eff. Dec. 1, 2014; Apr. 28, 2016, eff. Dec. 1, 2016; Apr. 2, 2024, eff. Dec. 1, 2024.)